Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ryan Davidson's avatar

So under your line of argument, nations in general, and the U.S. in particular, are obligated to do. . . what, exactly?

What does "stand firm" mean here?

Go to war every time a foreigner commits an act that would be a criminal offense under our own laws? Go to war every time one nation oppresses the citizens of another? Go to war every time one nation oppresses is own citizens?

Because if it doesn't mean any of those things, then there isn't a lot of room to criticize Knowles for being ambivalent about U.S. involvement in Israel's national security.

Remember, European cathedrals aren't burning because Israel and Palestine can't get along. It's because your own leaders are hate you.

Expand full comment
Anton's avatar

Your case for ordo amoris as the foundation of prudence is both timely and timeless. The way you reconcile moral clarity with practical wisdom cuts through modern binary thinking, offering a third way that’s neither rigid nor relativistic. A masterclass in philosophical writing that refuses to sacrifice depth for accessibility.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts